Sundar Pichai, the CEO of Google, testified before the House Judiciary Committee on December 11, 2018 to discuss “the widening gap of distrust between technology companies and the American people.” Prior to the hearings, Sundar Pichai’s prepared statement was released to the public.
Following is the prepared written statement of Sundar Pichai, along with a list of my own questions at the end:
HEARING BEFORE THE UNITED STATES HOUSE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE ON “TRANSPARENCY & ACCOUNTABILITY: EXAMINING GOOGLE AND ITS DATA COLLECTION, USE, AND FILTERING PRACTICES”
December 11, 2018
Chairman Goodlatte, Ranking Member Nadler, distinguished members of the Committee: Thank you for the opportunity to be here today.
I joined Google 15 years ago and have been privileged to serve as CEO for the past three years—though my love for information and technology began long before that. It’s been 25 years since I made the US my home. Growing up in India, I have distinct memories of when my family got its first phone and our first television. Each new technology made a profound difference in our lives. Getting the phone meant that I could call ahead to the hospital to check that the blood results were in before I traveled 2 hours by bus to get them. The television, well, it only had one channel, but I couldn’t have been more thrilled by its arrival! Those experiences made me a technology optimist, and I remain one today. Not only because I believe in technology, but because I believe in people and their ability to use technology to improve their lives. I ’m incredibly proud of what Google does to empower people around the world, especially here in the US.
I’d like to take a moment to share a bit of background on that. 20 years ago, two students—one from Michigan and one from Maryland—came together at Stanford with a big idea: to provide users with access to the world’s information. That mission still drives everything we do, whether that’s saving you a few minutes on your morning commute or helping doctors detect disease and save lives. Today, Google is more than a search engine. We are a global company that is committed to building products for everyone. That means working with many industries, from education and healthcare to manufacturing and entertainment.
Even as we expand into new markets we never forget our American roots. It’s no coincidence that a company dedicated to the free flow of information was founded right here in the US. As an American company, we cherish the values and freedoms that have allowed us to grow and serve so many users. I am proud to say we do work, and we will continue to work, with the government to keep our country safe and secure. Over the years our footprint has expanded far beyond California to states such as Texas, Virginia, Oklahoma and Alabama. Today in the US, we’re growing faster outside of the Bay Area than within it. I’ve had the opportunity to travel across the country and see all the places that are powering our digital economy—from Clarksville, to Pittsburgh, to San Diego, where we recently launched a partnership with the USO to help veterans and military families. Along the way, I’ve met many people who depend on Google to learn new skills, find jobs, or build new businesses. Over the past year, we have supported more than 1.5 million American businesses. Over the past three, we have made direct contributions of $150 billion to the US economy, added more than 24,000 employees, and paid over $43 billion to US partners across Search, YouTube, and Android. These investments strengthen our communities and support thousands of American jobs.
They also allow us to provide great services to our users to help them through the day. It’s an honor to play this role in people’s lives, and it’s one we know comes with great responsibility. Protecting the privacy and security of our users has long been an essential part of our mission. We have invested an enormous amount of work over the years to bring choice, transparency, and control to our users. These values are built into every product we make.
We recognize the important role of governments, including this Committee, in setting rules for the development and use of technology. To that end, we support federal privacy legislation and proposed a legislative framework for privacy earlier this year.
Users also look to us to provide accurate, trusted information. We work hard to ensure the integrity of our products, and we’ve put a number of checks and balances in place to ensure they continue to live up to our standards. I lead this company without political bias and work to ensure that our products continue to operate that way. To do otherwise would go against our core principles and our business interests. We are a company that provides platforms for diverse perspectives and opinions—and we have no shortage of them among our own employees. Some of our Googlers are former servicemen and women who have risked much in defense of our country. Some are civil libertarians who fiercely defend freedom of expression. Some are parents who worry about the role technology plays in our households. Some—like me—are immigrants to this country, profoundly grateful for the freedoms and opportunities it offers. Some of us are many of these things.
Let me close by saying that leading Google has been the greatest professional honor of my life. It’s a challenging moment for our industry, but I’m privileged to be here today. I greatly appreciate you letting me share the story of Google and our work to build products worthy of the trust users place in us.
Thank you for your attention. I look forward to answering your questions.
The committee members asked questions on behalf of the Google users in general and the American public in particular. Along the same lines, I have compiled the following questions that might help:
- What do you define as political bias?
- How would you verify/account for political biases in your search results?
- Do you think Net Neutrality hurts or harms freedom of speech for your information-based products?
- Will you be censoring search results and other information products based on the origination of the inquiry?
- Do you have tools to make sure and verify countries aren’t blocking information?
- Do you think a US version of GDPR is needed? How will this affect your business?
- What recourse do you have for those whose data was breached under your company?
- Can you share the report of the independent study related to political bias and what steps have you taken from that study to improve your search results and other information products?
- What steps are you taking or plan to take to reduce information bias at Google?
- Can you walk through what happens to data at rest and in motion across search, gmail and Google’s other information products?
- What is the lowest threshold in term of money for anyone to advertise on Google and how is the validity/reality of these ads done?
- What processes and tools you have in place that makes every employee and business conscious of their responsibility for safeguarding Google users’ data?
- Which other social media outlets are also responsible for spreading of fake news?
- How is Google going to work with governments, United Nations (UN) and other international entities? What data are you going to be sharing with these entities?
- How will Google strike a balance between free speech and censorship (intentional and unintentional)?
- What background investigations would you be doing on businesses that are on Google?
- How are you proactively looks at threats at all levels from a broader prospective?
- Does Google’s culture give preference to moral obligation versus profits only?
- How many independent studies have occurred across all of Google’s information products to check for misinformation threats?
- How much do you think is the personal responsibility of Google users’ biases when it comes to sharing fake news on purpose or by accident? What would happen to these users?
- As you utilize Artificial Intelligence, these systems can also have inherent biases leading to false positives. What are you doing to address this?
- What would Google do if asked by friendly governments to interfere with what information other countries’ get across all information products?
- If your user’s data is stored outside the country whose laws would you abide by, the users’ country or the country where data resides or where data is in motion?
Since Google is the most used search engine in the world along with its active participation in many industries, it is your right to ask your questions through your senators and representatives. Feel free to ask questions below as well.
So, what questions do you have for Sundar Pichai of Google?
Posted in: Current Topics